IN
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION – LAW
“EXHIBIT
G”
BENNETT J. VONDERHEIDE :
Plaintiff,
v.
CALVARY CHURCH :
Defendant,
v.
Wendy Flanders
Defendant
v.
Others Listed
Herein As Item 1. COMPLAINT PARTIES
K. Exhibits
G. PLAINTIFF Attorney
Longo’s Letter To DEFENDANT George Duff
November 22, 2004
George Duff
Chairman of Elders Calvary Church
1051 Landis Valley Road
Lancaster, PA 1760
Dear Mr. Duff:
As I am sure you are aware,
I represent Mr. Ben Vonderheide in his current custody dispute with
Wendy Flanders. The purpose of this correspondence is to advise you
that my client is considering legal acting against Calvary church.
It is my understanding that Kathy Yoder is employed as a counselor
at your church. In her capacity as a counselor at your church, she
has counseled Wendy Flanders as well as Quinta Vonderheide. I recently
received information from the principal of Leola Elementary School
that indicates to me that Me. Yoder is engaged .in a course of conduct
that is totally inappropriate as an employee of Calvary Church.
The documents I have reviewed
clearly indicate that Ms. Yoder has written derogatory and libelous
comments regarding my client to the principal. She clearly identified
herself as a counselor although she did not identify herself as an
employee of Calvary Church. She went on to slander my client, both
to the principal of Leola Elementary School as well as other employees
and teachers at the elementary school that my client's son attends.
Since her child also attends that school, all of those parties are
aware that Ms. Yoder works for Calvary Church. I believe the church
is clearly liable for the actions of its employees. In addition to
your employee's slanderous conduct, she is also attempting to interfere
with the custody of a child. She has interjected herself in a custody
dispute between a mother and a father that is clearly acrimonious.
She has attempted to sway those around and involved in the child's
life against the child's father. Interfering in the custody of a child
is a criminal offense in Pennsylvania. In my opinion, a civil action
can be filed against both Ms. Yoder and Calvary Church.
1 . Ms. Yoder, her husband
and others from Calvary Church physically moved the child away from
Conestoga, the only home he ever knew. They interfered with my client's
shared physical custody rights.
2. Ms. Yoder's counseling
of the child has been harmful to the child because of her bias.
3. My client points out
that for years he has attempted to notify Ms. Yoder's superiors and
many others at Calvary Church, yet his attempts have been rebuffed
and completely refused.
Based on his experience my client feels it is only fair that Calvary
Church would do the following:
1. Be prepared to assist
with NON-Calvary counseling for as long as it will take to remedy
the psychological and emotional damage done by Ms. Yoder. .
2. Immediately stop Ms.
Yoder, in her capacity with the Church, from having any contact whatsoever
with the child.
3. Immediately turn over
all records of therapy thus far withheld from my client, including
any and all correspondence, notes, internal memos or any other material
relating in any way to his son.
I believe Ms. Yoder's conduct
to be particularly outrageous in that a professional counselor should
certainly be aware that there are two sides to every story in a custody
dispute.
By choosing to align herself
with Ms. Flanders and accept everything Ms. Flanders has told her
to be truthful is unprofessional and irresponsible. She is communicating
to other people circumstances about which she has no first hand knowledge
and that are unsubstantiated reports of a woman whose credibility
is questionable.
I expect a written response
to this correspondence indicating the Church's position in this regard.
My client is justifiably concerned about the damage and impact your
Church and it's employees have had and continue to have on his son.
My client will thoughtfully consider your suggestions as to how this
matter can be resolved in order to repair the psychological harm that
has been done to his child.
If you choose to ignore
this letter my client has authorized me to pursue legal action.
K. Exhibits